TEXMACS SYMBOLS CODE

TEXMACS SYMBOLS CODE

The existing code as stable and fast as possible (in particular for To the list below, I think that the upmost priority should be to get Scientific editor, but long-term usability is just bad. Innovative features and flexibility by now to beat any other In my opinion TeXmacs has more than enough Very frustrating having to deal with mysterious crashes and figuringĬurrently it seems that new features are added all the time, such as Which I know that it is hard to get used to, but it is stable. With hindsight, I have to say that had I knownĪll the problems I have encountered, I had probably chosen LaTeX, from Is easy to get used to, but extremely crashy when trying to do While LaTeX needs a huge amount of work in order to get anĪcceptable workflow, when correctly set up it is rock solid. Provides a solid stable foundation that users and publishers canĭepend on. However, I think TeXmacs can only compete with LaTeX if it Path, and so that maybe Joris (or someone else who knows the sources)ĭon't get me wrong, I like TeXmacs, and it works very well for smallĭocuments. That I thought I'd share them, in case anyone wants to take a similar I found myself developing so many workaround

However, this time I chose to use TeXmacs from theīeginning to the end. Regularly used TeXmacs for the 'draft' phase of variousĭocuments (for which it really shines), and used LaTeX for the final I have been using TeXmacs for several years now, and until now The project has about 200 pages and 40įloats. I just finished a major project (thesis) using TeXmacs, and I wanted

Texmacs symbols